MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311784394 · doi:10.7759/cureus.32560

Management of Lateral Epicondylitis Using Transdermal Nitroglycerin: A Systematic Review

2022· review· en· W4311784394 on OpenAlexaff
Cara McCulloch, Miles Hunter, C. Lipp, Eddy Lang, Heather Ganshorn, Pavneet Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTendon Structure and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEpicondylitisTennis elbowElbowPhysical therapyCochrane LibraryElbow painForearmMEDLINETendinopathyObservational studySystematic reviewSurgeryTendonRandomized controlled trialInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lateral epicondylitis (LE), also known as tennis elbow, is an overuse tendinopathy originating from the forearm extensor tendons of the elbow. An emerging therapy for the treatment of LE is the use of transdermal nitroglycerin (NTG) patches for pain relief and improved function. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the current literature on the effect of a transdermal NTG patch for the treatment of LE. A literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SportDiscus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted. Studies selected for inclusion were those in which patients were clinically diagnosed with LE, RCTs, observational studies, and only articles published in English. Studies were excluded if they involved patients <18 years of age or involved patients with a potential alternative source of elbow pain such as previous surgery to the elbow, a previous history of dislocation, fracture of the elbow or tendon rupture, or a referred pain source such as cervical radiculopathy or peripheral nerve involvement. Studies were also excluded if they involved patients who were already prescribed topical NTG for any other indication (i.e., angina), and if the studies had no measurement of symptom relief or measurement or functional scoring. The initial search strategy yielded 69 articles, out of which four met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. The studies showed improvement in elbow pain in the short-term and mid-term (up to six months), while one study that followed participants for a five-year duration post-treatment, showed no benefit. Three studies used an effective NTG dose of 1.25mg/24h and one study used an effective dose of 1.44mg/24h. Topical NTG was more effective when combined with a tendon rehabilitation program. The most commonly reported side effects of topical NTG were headaches and dermatitis. Overall, the current literature demonstrates that the use of NTG patches for LE improves short- and mid-term pain as well as elbow function. However, more studies are required to fully understand the effect of topical NTG on LE, particularly the effective dose range and the long-term benefits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicTendon Structure and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207