MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311834524 · doi:10.4000/mythos.4688

Laurent Bricault, Richard Veymiers, Nicolás Amoroso (éds), Le mystère Mithra. Plongée au cœur d’un culte romain

2022· article· fr· W4311834524 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMythos · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Canadian institutionsà coeur d'homme
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce volume est le catalogue raisonn issu de l'exposition internationale portant le mme nom prsente au Muse royal de Mariemont (20.11.2021Mariemont (20.11. -17.04.2022)), au muse Saint-Raymond de Toulouse (14.05-30.10.2022) et qui se terminera l'Archologisches Museum de Frankfurt (19.11.2022Frankfurt (19.11. -15.04.2023)). Le catalogue parat un moment qui voit un fort regain d'intrt pour ce qui a trait l'histoire de ce culte, son iconographie 1 , son origine 2 et l'aspect archologique des mithraea 3 . Le volume s'articule en six parties thmatiquement organises qui abordent la provenance du culte, sa mythologie, ses sanctuaires, ses adeptes, sa diffusion et enfin son rapport avec le christianisme. Chacun de ces six points prsente une structure similaire : il est constitu par six ou sept sousparties, dont les trois dernires peuvent tre considres comme des cas d'tudes plus spcifiques, suivies par les fiches du catalogue. Seules les cinquime et sixime parties de l'ouvrage prsentent un schma diffrent, l'une constitue par douze sous-parties, l'autre formant un chapitre unique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it