Efficacy and Safety of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Evobrutinib in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Results of a Phase <scp>II</scp>, Randomized, <scp>Double‐Blind</scp>, <scp>Placebo‐Controlled Dose‐Ranging</scp> Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evobrutinib is a highly selective, orally administered Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor. The objective of this phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of evobrutinib in patients with active autoantibody-positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Patients were diagnosed with SLE by either the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria or at least four American College of Rheumatology criteria 6 months or more prior to screening, had an SLE Disease Activity Index-2000 score of 6 or more, were autoantibody-positive and on standard-of-care therapy. Randomization was 1:1:1:1 to oral evobrutinib 25 mg once daily (QD), 75 mg QD, 50 mg twice daily, or placebo. Primary efficacy endpoints were SLE responder index (SRI)-4 response at week 52 and SRI-6 response at week 52 in the high disease activity subpopulation. Safety endpoints included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: A total of 469 patients were randomized and received at least one dose of evobrutinib or placebo at the time of primary analysis. Mean (SD) age at baseline was 40.7 (±12.3) years; 94.9% of patients were female. Neither primary efficacy endpoint was met. All doses of evobrutinib were well tolerated, and there was no clear dose effect on the incidence of reported TEAEs, or serious TEAEs, including severe infections. CONCLUSION: This phase II, dose-ranging trial in SLE failed to show a treatment effect of evobrutinib versus placebo at any dose. Evobrutinib was generally well tolerated, with no dose effect observed for TEAEs. These results suggest that BTK inhibition does not appear to be an effective therapeutic intervention for patients with SLE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".