Disrobing behaviour in a forensic inpatient, a case report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Disrobing is a behaviour with serious implications for sexual safety. It is a challenge to manage in the inpatient environment and a barrier to discharge to the community. This paper presents an overview of the literature on disrobing – distinct from exhibitionistic disorder – and primarily described in the developmental disabilities' literature, and with respect to affective psychoses and epileptic post-ictal states. A case of disrobing in a forensic inpatient is outlined, which does not easily fit within the previously described explanatory or diagnostic paradigms for this behaviour. Behavioural and psychological analyses are reported, leading to a formulation of disrobing in this case as a complexly derived behaviour in a patient with chronic psychotic illness and a history of childhood sexual abuse. The importance of transdiagnostic thinking in patients with such complex histories is reviewed with attention to the intersection of deficits in distress tolerance from chronic psychotic illness and childhood sexual trauma. This case highlights the need for more research into trauma-informed interventions suitable for the serious mental illness (SMI) population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".