Spectral slowing in chronic stroke reflects abnormalities in both periodic and aperiodic neural dynamics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Decades of electrophysiological work have demonstrated the presence of "spectral slowing" in stroke patients - a prominent shift in the power spectrum towards lower frequencies, most evident in the vicinity of the lesion itself. Despite the reliability of this slowing as a marker of dysfunctional tissue across patient groups as well as animal models, it has yet to be explained in terms of the pathophysiological processes of stroke. To do so requires clear understanding of the neural dynamics that these differences represent, acknowledging the often overlooked fact that spectral power reflects more than just the amplitude of neural oscillations. To accomplish this, we used a combination of frequency domain and time domain measures to disambiguate and quantify periodic (oscillatory) and aperiodic (non-oscillatory) neural dynamics in resting state magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings from chronic stroke patients. We found that abnormally elevated low frequency power in these patients was best explained by a steepening of the aperiodic component of the power spectrum, rather than an enhancement of low frequency oscillations, as is often assumed. However, genuine oscillatory activity at higher frequencies was also found to be abnormal, with patients showing alpha slowing and diminished oscillatory activity in the beta band. These aperiodic and periodic abnormalities were found to covary, and could be detected even in the un-lesioned hemisphere, however they were most prominent in perilesional tissue, where their magnitude was predictive of cognitive impairment. This work redefines spectral slowing as a pattern of changes involving both aperiodic and periodic neural dynamics and narrows the gap in understanding between non-invasive markers of dysfunctional tissue and disease processes responsible for altered neural dynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".