MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

НЕКОТОРЫЕ РАЗМЫШЛЕНИЯ ОТНОСИТЕЛЬНО ФИАЛЫ С ГЕРАКЛОМ И АВГОЙ ИЗ РОГОЗЕНСКОГО СОКРОВИЩА

2022· article· en· W4312010864 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Treister

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings in Archaeology and History of Ancient and Medieval Black Sea Region · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrongNorthwestern University
KeywordsTreasureHoardQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryComposition (language)Period (music)ParallelsAncient historyArtLiteratureArchaeologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most important finds from the richest of the Thracian hoards, the Rogozen Treasure, is the so-called Auge Phiale. Its chronological position is crucial for the dating of the Hoard and had already been a point of debates. Its decoration, which consists of a mythological scene in high relief occupying the interior of the flat bottom and a relief pattern of alternating palmettes and lotus flowers grouped around the central rosette on the outside is discussed, thus allow us not only to determine the position of the vessel among the masterpieces of the Late Classical/Early Hellenistic metalware, but also to dwell on the genesis of the main subject of the composition. Clarifying the chronological position of the phiale is also extremely important for the establishment of the date, when the Treasure was hidden. Both the analysis of the general shape, the construction and composition of the elements of the vessel, the ornamental patterns decorating its bottom and the parallels of the figural composition on the inner medallion do not allow dating earlier than 350/340 BCE. Moreover, there is strong evidence that the phiale should be dated in the chronological frames of the last quarter of the 4th — first decades of the 3rd century BCE. The shape of the vessel and the decoration of its bottom may suggest a somewhat earlier dating, whereas that of the medallion — somewhat later, within the frames of the chronological period mentioned above. Thus, it may be a further confirmation of the history of the vessel, reconstructed on the grounds of its technological examination. This is not the only vessel from the Rogozen Treasure for which a dating after 340 BCE and as late as the last quarter of the 4th/early 3rd century BCE, first decades or even the second quarter of the 3rd century BCE has been already proposed. Consequently, it provides another argument that the Treasure was buried much later than it was usually suggested before (330s BCE). Одной из самых важных находок из богатейшего фракийского клада, найденного в Рогозене, является фиала с изображением Геракла и Авги. Ее хронологическая позиция имеет решающее значение для датировки клада и уже была предметом споров. Рассматривается форма чаши, ее детали, представленные выполненной в высоком рельефе мифологической сценой, занимающей внутреннюю часть плоского дна, и рельефного декора из чередующихся пальметт и цветов лотоса, сгруппированных вокруг центральной розетты снаружи. Это позволяет нам не только определить место сосуда среди шедевров позднеклассической / раннеэллинистической торевтики, но и остановиться на генезисе основного предмета композиции. Уточнение датировки фиалы также чрезвычайно важно для установления даты тезаврации клада. Как анализ общей формы сосуда, конструкции и состава его элементов, декора, украшающего его дно, так и параллели фигурной композиции на внутреннем медальоне не позволяют датировать чашу ранее 350/340 гг. до н.э. Более того, есть веские основания относить ее к период последней четверти IV — первых десятилетий III в. до н.э. Форма сосуда и декор его дна могут свидетельствовать о несколько более ранней датировке, а медальона — о более поздней, в рамках указанного выше хронологического периода. Таким образом, это может быть еще одним подтверждением истории чаши, реконструированного на основании его технологического осмотра. Это не единственный сосуд из Рогозенского клада, для которого предлагалась датировка после 340 г. до н.э., в том числе последней четвертью IV / началом III в. до н.э., первыми десятилетиями или даже второй четвертью III в. до н.э. Следовательно, это еще один аргумент в пользу того, что клад был спрятан намного позже, чем обычно предполагалось ранее (330-е гг. до н. э.).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.009
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings in Archaeology and History of Ancient and Medieval Black Sea RegionSame topicAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207