MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312055997 · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2022.112066

Cross-sectional and prospective associations between homocysteine and a frailty index: A post-hoc analysis of the multidomain Alzheimer's prevention trial (MAPT)

2022· article· en· W4312055997 on OpenAlexaff
Philippe St‐Martin, Isabelle J. Dionne, Mathieu Maltais, Yves Rolland

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Gerontology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCHIST-ERAFondation Pierre FabreInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleAvid RadiopharmaceuticalsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de ToulouseAgence Nationale de la RechercheLes Laboratories Pierre Fabre
KeywordsConfoundingMedicineHomocysteineCross-sectional studyPost-hoc analysisProspective cohort studyGerontologyProportional hazards modelInternal medicineDemographyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Homocysteine (Hcy) has been associated with several health problems, including reduced physical capacity. No study appears to have looked at the role of Hcy values longitudinally on physical capacity deterioration in older adults. The objective is to examine cross-sectional and prospective associations between Hcy values and frailty in the elderly and investigate Hcy potential association with the onset of frailty. METHODS: 769 community-dwelling older adults from the MAPT study were recruited for this study. Total Hcy was measured at baseline. Frailty was evaluated at 5 different collection timepoints: baseline, 6-month, 1-, 2-, and 3-year using a frailty index (FI) composed of 19 items. Linear regressions adjusted for all the confounders (age, gender, educational level, MAPT group allocation and Omega-3) were performed to examine the cross-sectional associations of homocysteine values with the FI. A cox model was used to test the association of Hcy with the onset of frailty. RESULTS: Mean Hcy values (15.9 ± 5.6 μmol\L) were obtained from 769 community-dwelling adults (75.7 ± 4.6 years old). After adjustments, a significant (β = 0.002, (00002-0.003)) and positive association between baseline Hcy values and FI was found (ß = 0.002). Additionally, higher values of Hcy were associated with a worsening of FI after 3 years (ß = 0.002, p = 0.003). A significant association between baseline Hcy values and the likelihood of developing frailty was discovered by incident event analysis (HR: 1.04 (1.01-1.06), p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: High levels of Hcy are associated with the fragility process in community-dwelling older adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.416

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental GerontologySame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207