Systemic and ocular manifestations of <scp>Anti‐MOG</scp> disease in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Purpose: There is limited published data on anti‐MOG disease in Canada. The purpose of this study was to increase the understanding of the ophthalmic and neurological manifestations of anti‐MOG disease in adults living in a Canadian setting through a retrospective/prospective chart review. Methods: Data from standard of care ophthalmic and neurological assessments was collected for patients who were diagnosed with Anti‐MOG disease at a quaternary care teaching hospital. Results: Nineteen patients diagnosed with Anti‐MOG disease were identified. Of these, 70% were female and 30% were male, with ages ranging from 18 to 82 years old. On ocular examination the majority of eyes had normal visual acuity (87%). Three eyes were hand motion or no light perception. On fundus examination, 84% of participants presented with optic disc abnormalities with the most common findings being disc atrophy and temporal pallor. In patients affected with Anti‐MOG with decreased visual acuity, pattern Visual Evoked Potentials were significantly reduced in amplitude. Other than the initial optic neuritis, half of participants experienced no additional neurological effects, while the others experienced variable residual symptoms such as scintillating scotomas, recurrent mild paresthesia of both legs, seizures, urinary urgency, oscillopsia and neuropathic pain. Of the 15 participants with recent MRI results, 67% showed persistent hyperintense T2 abnormalities while 22% showed resolution of prior T2 abnormalities. Conclusions: The initial results of this study match existing literature for anti‐MOG disease. Optic nerve atrophy and temporal pallor are commonly found ocular signs in patients with anti‐MOG. Interestingly, patients were found to have persistent decreased VEP amplitudes with normal inner and outer retinal function. Overall, the ophthalmic and neurological findings were variable between participants. Study recruitment is ongoing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".