MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312086044 · doi:10.1002/alz.069333

Associations between <i>ALOX5</i> and <i>ALOX5AP</i> Genetic Polymorphisms and Cognitive Performance in Patients with Alzheimer’s Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment

2022· article· en· W4312086044 on OpenAlexaff
Shiropa Noor, Lisa Y. Xiong, Yuen Yan Wong, Che‐Yuan Wu, Walter Swardfager

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSingle-nucleotide polymorphismPsychologyDementiaInternal medicineCognitionOncologySNPMedicineAudiologyGenotypeClinical psychologyPsychiatryDiseaseGeneticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Leukotriene activity may contribute to cognitive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Leukotrienes are synthesized by 5‐lipoxygenase (5‐LOX) and its activating protein (FLAP), encoded by ALOX5 and ALOX5AP, respectively. This cross‐sectional study investigated the associations of ALOX5 and ALOX5AP single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with cognitive performance in patients with AD or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Method ALOX5 SNP rs2029253 and ALOX5AP SNPs rs10507391, rs12429692, rs4147064, rs9551963, rs9579646 were selected based on previous associations to ischemic stroke. Participants in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) diagnosed with AD or MCI at baseline were separated by genotype for each SNP. Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT), Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE), and Trail Making Part B (TRAB) tests were selected to measure memory, overall cognitive status, and executive function, respectively. Associations between SNPs and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) were also explored. Additive, dominant, and recessive models were tested for each SNP and outcome pair. Linear regressions were used to assess associations between genotypes and outcomes controlling for age, sex, and education. Result rs12429692 TT homozygotes (MAF = 25.3%) had lower RAVLT learning (i.e. Trial 5 minus Trial 1) scores (F1,508 = 7.19, p = 0.008, n = 513, recessive model). rs4147064 TC heterozygotes (MAF = 46.5%) had higher MMSE scores than TT homozygotes (F2,508 = 3.34, p = 0.036, n = 514, additive model). rs9551963 CC homozygotes (MAF = 49.1%) had higher TRAB times (F1,481 = 6.06, p = 0.014, n = 486, recessive model). Split by sex, rs12429692 was associated with TRAB times in males (F1,277 = 5.52, p = 0.020, n = 281, dominant model) and rs9551963 was associated with RAVLT % forgetting scores in females (F1,212 = 4.98, p = 0.027, n = 216, recessive model). The rs12429692 A/T SNP (MAF = 25.4%) trended towards an association with WMH (F1,507 = 3.33, p = 0.069, n = 512, recessive model). Conclusion Three ALOX5AP SNPs were associated with aspects of cognitive performance. This preliminary clinical evidence suggests a possible effect of leukotriene synthesis on cognition in patients with AD or MCI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAsthma and respiratory diseases→French-language works237,207→