MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312086583 · doi:10.1002/alz.066969

Development and Validation of a Cognitive Evaluation tool for Multilingual Populations: The Visual Cognitive Assessment Test (VCAT)

2022· article· en· W4312086583 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nagaendran Kandiah, See Ann Soo, Levinia Lim, Yi Jin Leow, Ashwati Vipin, Kok Pin Ng

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortDementiaCognitionCambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated BatteryConstruct validityNeuropsychological assessmentCognitive testNeuropsychological testNeuropsychologyPsychologyTest (biology)MedicineClinical psychologyPsychometricsDiseasePsychiatryWorking memorySpatial memoryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background With increasing research into novel disease modifying therapies for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and mild dementia, there is a need for large scale early detection of cognitive disorders. However, existing cognitive evaluation tools largely cater for native English speakers. We designed and validated a novel visual based cognitive evaluation tool that could be applied to multilingual populations worldwide without the need for translation. Methods The development of the VCAT included pilot testing of individual test items, test refinement and development of a field version of VCAT. The test items covered domains of episodic memory, executive function, visuospatial function, semantic language and attention. The initial validation was carried out in a single centre cohort from Singapore comprising of cognitively normal (CN), MCI and dementia participants. Subsequent validation was carried out in centres across four Southeast Asian countries including Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia and Philippines. Additional evaluation of construct validity against comprehensive neuropsychological test battery has been performed. Further validation in Canada, Brazil, India and South Korea is on‐going. Results In the initial single centre validation in a cohort of 206 participants with a mean age of 67.8 (8.86) years and mean years of education of 10.5(6.0), the area under the curve (AUC) of VCAT for detection of cognitive impairment, CI (MCI and mild dementia) was 93.3 (95% CI 90.1 to 96.4). The Se and Sp of VCAT for the diagnosis of CI were 85.6% and 81.1%, respectively. In a wider Southeast Asian multicentre cohort of 284 participants, VCAT had an AUC of 90.5 (95% CI 87.0‐94.0) in discriminating CN from CI. The multiple languages used to administer VCAT in the four countries did not significantly influence test scores. VCAT and its subdomains demonstrated good construct validity in terms of both convergent and divergent validity and good internal consistency (α = .74). Mean time‐to‐complete VCAT was 15.7 ± 7.3 min. Conclusions The VCAT without the need for translation in multilingual populations has demonstrated high accuracy for the detection of MCI and mild dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→