MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312086768 · doi:10.1002/alz.067488

Longitudinal tau burden partially mediates synergistic influence of vascular risk and amyloid‐beta on cognitive decline in clinically normal older adults

2022· article· en· W4312086768 on OpenAlexaff
Wai‐Ying Wendy Yau, Zahra Shirzadi, Jennifer S. Rabin, Michael J Properzi, Aaron P. Schultz, Dorene M. Rentz, Keith A. Johnson, Reisa A. Sperling, Jasmeer P. Chhatwal

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive declineMedicinePittsburgh compound BInternal medicineLongitudinal studyCognitionOncologyMediationEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceFramingham Heart StudyAlzheimer's diseaseGerontologyFramingham Risk ScoreDementiaCardiologyDiseasePsychologyPathologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Vascular risk is increasingly recognized as an important contributor to late‐life cognitive impairment. Elevated vascular risk and amyloid‐beta (Aβ) burden have been synergistically associated with greater cognitive decline, however the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We examined the combined effects of baseline vascular risk and Aβ on longitudinal tau burden. We further investigated the extent to which tau accumulation mediates the synergistic effects of increased vascular risk and Aβ on prospective cognitive decline. Method We included data from 175 older adults (cognitively unimpaired at baseline) from the Harvard Aging Brain Study (HABS) (Table 1). Baseline Aβ burden was measured with Pittsburgh Compound‐B (PiB) PET. Baseline vascular risk was quantified using the office‐based Framingham Heart Study general cardiovascular disease risk score (FHS‐CVD). Tau burden was measured longitudinally with Flortaucipir‐PET in inferior temporal cortex (ITC), an early site of neocortical tau accumulation and a region of interest based on prior work. Cognition was assessed longitudinally using Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite (PACC). Using linear mixed effects models, we examined the interactive effects of FHS‐CVD and Aβ on longitudinal ITC tau accumulation, adjusting for age, sex and APOE ε4 status. Next, we examined the FHS‐CVD*Aβ interaction using floodlight/Johnson‐Neyman analysis to determine the level of Aβ at which effects on ITC tau accumulation became significant. Using moderated mediation analysis, we further examined whether tau accumulation mediated the FHS‐CVD*Aβ interactive effects on PACC decline. Result Individual ITC‐tau trajectories are shown in Figure 1. We found an interaction between higher baseline FHS‐CVD and elevated Aβ with greater longitudinal ITC‐tau accumulation (Figure 2; Table 2). Floodlight analysis showed the FHS‐CVD*Aβ interaction became significant (p<0.05) at PiB‐DVR>1.22, lower than the conventional threshold for amyloid‐positivity (PiB‐DVR>1.32). Moderated mediation models revealed ITC‐tau accumulation partially mediated (30%) the effect of FHS‐CVD on PACC decline at high (PiB‐DVR=1.85: β=‐0.48, p<0.001) but not low (PiB‐DVR=1.17: β=‐0.16, p=0.09) levels of baseline Aβ (Figure 3). Conclusion Vascular risk may interact with Aβ to promote cognitive decline partially through accelerating tau accumulation, even at subthreshold levels of Aβ. Further studies are needed to elucidate other mechanisms that mediate the remaining effects of this clinically important interaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→