MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312087024 · doi:10.1002/alz.067250

REM sleep is associated with the integrity of the cholinergic basal forebrain in aMCI participants

2022· article· en· W4312087024 on OpenAlexaff
Marie‐Ève Martineau‐Dussault, Véronique Daneault, Hélène Blais, Dominique Lorrain, Carol Hudon, Célyne Bastien, Dominique Petit, Alexandre Lafrenière, Julie Legault, Cynthia Thompson, Jacques Montplaisir, Nadia Gosselin, Julie Carrier

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSleep and Wakefulness Research
Canadian institutionsHealth and Social Services Centre University Institute of Geriatrics of SherbrookeCanadian Sleep & Circadian NetworkUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasal forebrainPolysomnographyCohortCholinergic neuronAudiologyDementiaMedicineCholinergicPsychologyRapid eye movement sleepDementia with Lewy bodiesInternal medicineEye movementNeuroscienceDiseaseApnea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The basal forebrain cholinergic system (BFCS) degenerates in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) before the onset of dementia. Interestingly, rapid‐eye movement (REM) sleep is highly dependent on cholinergic activity. In AD patients, REM sleep duration is reduced but the underlying brain mechanisms are still unclear. Our objective was to investigate the associations between REM‐sleep quantity and BFCS integrity in participants with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) compared to healthy controls. Method Sixty‐two participants (31 cognitively healthy: 66.8 ± 7.2 years old, 13 women; 31 aMCI: 68.3 ± 8.8 years old, 7 women) underwent polysomnography and structural magnetic resonance imaging examinations. REM sleep duration (number of minutes) and proportion (%) were computed. All participants had a REM sleep apnea‐hypopnea index <15. T1‐weighted images were preprocessed using CAT12 and the DARTEL algorithm, and the mean intensity of BFCS subregions (i.e., Ch1‐2‐3, Ch4 and total BFCS) was extracted using the JuBrain Anatomy Toolbox. Multiple regressions were performed between BFCS subregional intensities and REM sleep indices controlling for age, sex and total intracranial volume, in the whole cohort and in the two groups separately. Result In the whole cohort, REM sleep duration and proportion were positively associated with Ch4 intensity (duration: r = 0.31, p = 0.017; proportion: r = 0.35, p = 0.007; Figure 1A and B) and total BFCS intensity (duration: r = 0.31, p = 0.016; proportion: r = 0.29, p = 0.024). Analyses stratified by cognitive status showed the same pattern in aMCI participants: REM sleep duration and proportion were positively associated with both Ch4 intensity (duration: r = 0.44, p = 0.018; proportion: r = 0.49, p = 0.009; Figure 1C and D) and total BFCS intensity (duration: r = 0.46, p = 0.014; proportion: r = 0.46, p = 0.013). No significant association, nor trend, was found in cognitively healthy participants (Figure 1C and D). Conclusion In aMCI participants, lower REM sleep duration and proportion were associated with a decreased integrity of the BFCS, especially the Nucleus Basalis of Meynert. Our results support the notion that REM sleep alterations are an early marker of the degeneration of the BFCS in prodromal AD, before the onset of dementia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicSleep and Wakefulness Research→French-language works237,207→