MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312087266 · doi:10.1002/alz.066997

Association of Cerebrovascular Reactivity and Cognitive Performance in a Racially Diverse Cohort

2022· article· en· W4312087266 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ambar Kulshreshtha, Brandon Henley, Maureen Okafor, Steven C. Rogers, Tiffany Thomas, Felicia C. Goldstein, Ihab Hajjar

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineCognitionInternal medicineCohortCardiologyEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceTrail Making TestBoston Naming TestCognitive declineResting state fMRIAudiologyPsychologyCognitive impairmentPsychiatryDementiaNeuropsychologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) to increased carbon dioxide (CO2) reflects cerebral microvascular function and is impaired in hypertension and stroke. Limited studies have looked at its relationship with cognitive performance in African Americans and Whites. Methods We used data from the Brain‐Stress Hypertension and Aging Program cohort (B‐SHARP) consisting of racially diverse individuals with normal cognition or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). CVR was measured using advanced signal modeling approach developed by BH/IH during blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) resting state ‐fMRI. Participants underwent cognitive assessment using global and domain‐specific tests such as Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Boston Naming Test (BNT), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test‐Revised (HVLT‐R), and Trail Making Test. We used multivariate regression models to assess the relationship of CVR and cognitive domains and tested interaction of CVR with race. Results Successful CVR data were completed on 219 participants with mean age= 65.3 years (SD 7.8), 46% African American and 65% women. An increased resting whole brain CVR was associated with a higher MoCA score (β = 6.46, SE 2.43, p‐value 0.008), higher BNT score (β =2.15, SE 0.93 p‐value 0.02), and shorter time on Trail B‐A, (β= ‐113.4, SE 42.0, p‐value 0.007) after adjusting for mean arterial pressure. After adjusting for age, sex, and race, increased resting whole brain CVR was associated with higher MoCA (β =4.4, SE 2.26, p‐value 0.05), BNT score (β =1.46, SE 0.89, p‐value 0.1) and Trail B‐A score (β =‐86.7, SE 40.3, p‐value 0.03). There was no association with delayed memory based on HVLT‐R. The results were similar for individuals with normal cognition or MCI. There was a significant interaction by race (p<0.01) such that whole brain CVR was associated with better performance on all cognitive tests for African Americans but not for Whites. Conclusions Higher CVR, reflected by resting state BOLD‐fMRI, was associated with higher overall cognitive status and specific domains including language and executive functioning in individuals with normal cognition or MCI. The differential effect in African Americans vs Whites could suggest a greater contribution of microvascular dysfunction for the higher prevalence of cognitive impairment in African Americans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207