Impact of Mild Behavioral Impairment and Mild Cognitive Impairment on Risk for Dementia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background There has been a shift in research to explore early indicators associated with preclinical/prodromal dementia. Recent research highlights the importance of non‐cognitive factors, such as neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), as articulated in criteria for mild behavioral impairment (MBI). Previous research suggests MBI is a risk factor for dementia regardless of if one is cognitively healthy or diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The goal of this study is to examine risk for dementia subtypes based on the presence of MBI and/or MCI. Method Secondary data analysis of participants (n = 17,289) from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center who were cognitively healthy (n = 11,770) or diagnosed with MCI (n = 5,519). Risk for dementia, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) were examined using Cox proportional hazard models. Result Almost 25% of the entire sample met the operationalized diagnostic criteria for MBI (n = 4,274). The risk for dementia almost tripled among persons with MBI and increased by almost seven‐fold if they had MCI. Among persons with MBI, the risk for FTD was six times greater and the risk for DLB and AD was three times greater, compared to those without MBI. Additionally, for participants who had MCI, the risk for DLB was six times greater, the risk for AD was over nine times greater, and the risk for FTD was almost sixteen times greater, compared to those who were cognitively healthy. There was a significant interaction found between MBI and MCI status. For cognitively healthy older adults with MBI, the risk was almost eleven times greater for FTD, whereas for older adults with MCI and MBI, the risk was three times greater for DLB. Conclusion Older adults with MBI and MCI are at an increased risk for all types of dementia. Additionally, cognitively healthy participants with MBI are found to have a greater risk for FTD, where participants with MCI and MBI had a greater risk for DLB. These results provide support for MBI as a prodromal state of all‐cause dementia, and highlight the importance of recognizing these symptoms across the spectrum of cognitive decline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".