MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312087520 · doi:10.1002/alz.066798

Sex differences in the protective effects of <i>APOE</i> ε2 on longitudinal cognitive decline

2022· article· en· W4312087520 on OpenAlexaff
Madeline Wood Alexander, Lisa Y. Xiong, Rachel F. Buckley, Walter Swardfager, Mario Masellis, Sandra E. Black, Jennifer S. Rabin

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook HospitalToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApolipoprotein ECognitionLongitudinal studyDementiaCognitive declinePsychologyMedicineVerbal learningEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceInternal medicineGerontologyClinical psychologyDemographyDiseasePsychiatryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The APOE ε2 allele confers protection against cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease. There is some suggestion that APOE ε2 may have sex‐specific effects on cognition. We investigated sex differences in associations between APOE ε2 and longitudinal cognitive trajectories in a large sample of older adults. Method We used data from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Centre (NACC) database. We included participants who were ≥ 50 years old, White, free from dementia at baseline, and completed at least one follow‐up cognitive assessment. We categorized participants as APOE ε2 carriers (combining heterozygous and homozygous ε2 carriers) or APOE ε3 homozygote carriers. APOE ε4 carriers (including ε2/ε4 carriers) were excluded. Cognition was assessed approximately annually. We computed composite scores for memory, language, attention, and executive function. We examined the interaction between APOE allele (ε2 vs ε3), sex, and time on longitudinal cognition in linear mixed models, adjusting for baseline age, baseline MMSE, education, number of follow‐up visits, NACC test version, and their interactions with time. Result We included 6,733 participants classified as cognitively normal at baseline (mean age=72.9±9.12 years, mean education=16.0±2.87 years, 62.5% female), and 1,932 participants classified as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) at baseline (mean age=75.2±8.91 years, mean education=15.6±3.28 years, 44% female). Among participants with normal cognition, we observed significant interactions between sex, genotype, and time on longitudinal memory (β=0.022, p=0.039) and language (β=0.015, p=0.038), but not attention (β=0.01, p=0.09) or executive function (β=0.006, p=0.30). In sex stratified analyses, relative to male APOE ε3 carriers, male APOE ε2 carriers showed slower rates of decline in domains of memory and language. This effect was not observed in females. No significant interactions between sex, genotype, and time were observed in participants with MCI (memory: β=‐0.04, p=0.1; language: β=‐0.02, p=0.4; attention: β=‐0.01, p=0.5; executive function: β=‐0.02, p=0.3). Conclusion Among cognitively normal adults, APOE ε2 carriage protects males but not females against longitudinal memory and language decline. The sex‐specific effect of APOE ε2 may contribute to the lower incidence of Alzheimer’s disease in males compared to females. Future research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms behind the observed sex disparities in cognitive decline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→