Sex‐specific mediational effects of microglial activation on Alzheimer’s disease proteinopathy in older adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Women show disproportionate burden of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology and higher AD dementia prevalence compared to men, yet the mechanism(s) driving these vulnerabilities are unknown. There is sexual dimorphism in immunologic functioning and neuroimmune processes are implicated in AD genesis. Using neuropathology indicators from human brain tissue, we examined the mediational role of microglial activation on the relationship between amyloid and tau and how it differs by sex. Method 187 decedents (64% female; 89 years‐old at death; 62% non‐demented) from the Rush Memory and Aging Project completed neuropathological evaluations with brain tissue quantified for microglial activation, amyloid‐β, and tau. Proportion of morphologically activated microglia was determined via immunohistochemistry (HLA‐DP‐DQ‐DR) and morphological staging (stage I, II, or III). Amyloid and tau burden were quantified via immunohistochemistry (M00872 or AT8, respectively). Using causal counterfactual modeling, we estimated the mediational effect of microglial activation on the amyloid to tau relationship in the whole sample and stratified by sex (amyloid→ microglial activation→ tau). Alternative models tested the role of microglia activation as the precipitating event (microglial activation→ amyloid→ tau). Result Microglial activation significantly mediated 67% (95%CI 32‐90) of the relationship between amyloid and tau in the whole sample; however, stratified analyses suggested this effect was stronger and only statistically significant in women. 57% (95%CI 20‐100) of the effect of amyloid‐β on tau was mediated through microglial activation in women, compared to 19% (95%CI 0‐62) in men. Secondary models suggested that mediational effects were driven by cortical versus subcortical microglial activation. Alternative models suggested that in women, microglial activation was a significant exposure both preceding the amyloid‐β to tau relationship (50%, 95%CI 22‐89) and directly related to tau burden (50%, 95%CI 11‐78). In contrast, in men, only the direct effect of microglial activation to tau reached significance (74%, 95%CI 34‐99) (mediational effect: 25%, 95%CI 1‐66). Conclusion Our models suggest a reciprocal, bidirectional relationship between amyloid‐β and microglial activation that accounts for tau burden in women. In men, direct independent (non‐mediational) relationships between microglial activation or amyloid‐β with tau were observed. Microglial activation may be disproportionately important for AD pathogenesis in women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".