MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312087930 · doi:10.1002/alz.062802

Decreased Peripheral Endothelial Function is Associated with Mild Cognitive Impairment and Lower Performance on Memory and Language

2022· article· en· W4312087930 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Cheng, Steven C. Rogers, Tiffany Thomas, Maureen Okafor, Nick Seyfried, Ambar Kulshreshtha, Felicia C. Goldstein, Arshed A. Quyyumi, Ihab Hajjar

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentInternal medicineCardiologyLogistic regressionBoston Naming TestPeripheralReactive hyperemiaCognitionBlood pressureCognitive declineDementiaDiseaseBlood flowPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The association between cardiovascular risk factors and cognitive decline is known, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We investigated whether peripheral microvascular and endothelial function, measured by pulsatile arterial tonometry (EndoPAT), is associated with cognitive performance and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Method This study is based on data from 340 participants (150 with MCI, 190 with normal cognition (NC); mean age 64.9 (SD: 7.7) years, 61% female, 48% African American) enrolled in the VAScular ContribUtors to prodromaL AlzheimeR’s disease (VASCULAR) study. Peripheral microvascular function was assessed using EndoPAT (Itamar Inc.), and a reactive hyperemic index (RHI) was derived after a 5‐minute arterial occlusion period and includes a continuous or discrete (dichotomous or tertile) variable. Cognitive assessment and diagnostic categorization performed at the baseline visit included Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Boston Naming Test, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test‐Revised (HVLT‐R), and Trail Making Test. Groups were compared with a t‐test and multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to adjust for demographic and risk factor covariates. Result Participants with MCI had lower RHI, indicative of greater peripheral microvascular and endothelial dysfunction, compared to NC (mean 1.9 (SD: 1.4) vs 2.2 (0.7) AU, p=0.014), which remained significant after adjustment for age, education, sex, race, systolic blood pressure, history of diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and smoking (OR: 3.91 for each 1‐unit change in RHI (95% CI: 1.00, 7.08), p=0.03). When analyzed in tertiles, a lower RHI (<1.75 AU) was also associated with poorer expressive language (Boston Naming Test, p=0.03), and verbal memory performance (HVLT‐R delayed recall, p=0.01; HVLT‐R retention, p=0.02). Executive function (Trail Making Test) and overall cognitive status (MoCA) were not significantly associated with RHI. Conclusion Peripheral microvascular endothelial dysfunction, measured as RHI, was associated with MCI and with lower performances on measures of language and memory. These data highlight the importance of systemic microvascular health in cognitive health. Strategies targeting microvascular endothelial function may need further investigation in cognitive therapeutics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & DementiaSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207