MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312088370 · doi:10.1002/alz.062021

Hippocampal grading is sensitive to changes in cognition in early MCI

2022· article· en· W4312088370 on OpenAlexaff
Cassandra Morrison, Mahsa Dadar, Neda Shafiee, D. Louis Collins

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHippocampal formationCognitionDementiaNeuroimagingAlzheimer's diseaseClinical Dementia RatingCognitive declineAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativePsychologyHippocampal sclerosisGrading (engineering)MedicineNeuroscienceDiseaseInternal medicineCognitive impairmentTemporal lobeBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Increased age and cognitive decline are both associated with changes in the hippocampus. These associations are often measured using hippocampal volume measurements and changes in episodic memory. Some studies have also observed a relationship between hippocampal volume and global cognition. However, these studies often only find associations in progressed stages of cognitive decline. This study examined (1) if hippocampal grading is associated with global cognition in cognitively normal controls (NC), early MCI (eMCI), late (lMCI), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and (2) whether these associations differ across diagnostic cohorts. Methods Participants for this study were selected from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. They were included if they completed baseline MRI scans and the Alzheimer’s disease Assessment Scale (ADAS‐13) and Clinical Dementia Rating – Sum of Boxes (CDR‐SB) cognitive tests. A total of 1620 older adults met the inclusion criteria and were included (495 CN, 262 eMCI, 545 lMCI, and 318 AD). Linear regressions examined the association between hippocampal grading and cognitive scores. Results Lower global cognition (measured by increased ADAS‐13 scores) was associated with hippocampal grading scores in in NC, eMCI, lMCI and AD cohorts. Lower global cognition (measured by increased CDR‐SB scores) was associated with hippocampal grading scores in lMCI and AD, but not in eMCI or NC groups. Conclusion Hippocampal grading was associated with changes in global cognition in healthy controls and in disease cohorts when there is sufficient dynamic range in the cognitive test. No correlation between CDR‐SB and NC was found because the NC group only had CDR‐SB scores of 0 and 1. Hippocampal grading may, thus, be a useful measure that is sensitive to progressive changes early in the disease course. Future research should determine if this method is associated with longitudinal changes in cognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→