MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312088496 · doi:10.1002/alz.060982

Mild behavioral impairment symptom severity predicts tau hyperphosphorylation assessed by plasma p‐tau181 across the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum

2022· article· en· W4312088496 on OpenAlexaff
Firoza Z Lussier, Joseph Therriault, Cécile Tissot, Stijn Servaes, Andréa Lessa Benedet, Nicholas J. Ashton, Thomas K. Karikari, Mira Chamoun, Jenna Stevenson, Nesrine Rahmouni, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Zahinoor Ismail, Tharick A. Pascoal, Pedro Rosa‐Neto

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryHotchkiss Brain InstituteMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApathyPsychologyDementiaCohortAnxietyClinical psychologyInternal medicineIrritabilityMoodPsychosisClinical Dementia RatingPsychiatryDiseaseMedicineCognition

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) is a neurobehavioral syndrome characterized by the emergence of persistent non‐cognitive neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in older adults, representing an at‐risk state for dementia and a potential marker of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, few studies have investigated associations between MBI and plasma biomarkers of AD pathophysiology, specifically tau hyperphosphorylation. Method Individuals across the AD spectrum (cognitively unimpaired (CU) and impaired (CI)) were selected from the Translational Biomarkers of Aging and Dementia (TRIAD) cohort. MBI was assessed using the MBI‐Checklist (MBI‐C), which assesses NPS severity in five subdomains: decreased motivation (apathy), emotional dysregulation (mood/anxiety symptoms), impulse dyscontrol (agitation, impulsivity, abnormal reward salience), social inappropriateness (impaired social cognition), and abnormal thoughts/perception (psychosis). Plasma levels of p‐tau181 were quantified in all individual, and log‐transformed due to right skew. Spearman correlation analysis investigated cross‐sectional associations between plasma p‐tau181 and MBI‐C scores, and between baseline plasma p‐tau181 and annual change in MBI‐C. Multivariable linear regression analyses assessed the ability of cross‐sectional and longitudinal MBI‐C scores to predict plasma p‐tau181, adjusting for age, sex, education, and diagnostic group (CU/CI, Aβ +/‐). Result Cross‐sectional MBI data were available for 211 individuals, with longitudinal data available for 128 individuals (). Significant correlations were found between plasma p‐tau181 and MBI‐C total and apathy scores in the cross‐sectional sample (Figure A). Further, significant correlations were found with plasma p‐tau181 and the annual change in MBI‐C total and apathy scores (Figure B). These associations were corroborated by significant standardized and adjusted regression coefficients from multivariate regression models, which showed that baseline and longitudinal MBI‐C total and apathy score predicted plasma level of p‐tau181 (Figure C). Conclusion Our study provides novel findings on the association between MBI and tau hyperphosphorylation assessed using plasma biomarkers in an AD cohort. These results add to the existing evidence for MBI as a clinical manifestation of AD pathology and support the use of the MBI‐C as an enrichment tool for clinical trial enrollment and therapeutic intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→French-language works237,207→