MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312088526 · doi:10.1002/alz.062294

Harmony at HOME (Help Online Modifying the Environment): Proof‐of‐concept clinical trial of an innovative telehealth intervention for adults with Alzheimer’s disease with behavioral symptoms

2022· article· en· W4312088526 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elizabeth K. Rhodus, Rosmy George, MaryEllen Thompson, Kimberly Lowry, Beth Coy, Julia Johnson, Kelly Parsons, Justin M. Barber, Heather Nichols, Alexandra Hunter, Angela Holloman, Richard J. Kryscio, Mario Baum, Gregory A. Jicha

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelehealthApathyRandomized controlled trialMedicineIntervention (counseling)AnxietyPhysical therapyAttendanceClinical trialOccupational therapyDiseasePsychiatryTelemedicineHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Nearly 90% of adults diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias experience behavioral symptoms (e.g., agitation, depression, anxiety, apathy). Current pharmacological treatment options lack high efficacy and pose dangerous side effects. Innovative approaches are needed to enhance care for these symptoms. This study aimed to assess feasibility of Harmony at HOME (Help Online Modifying the Environment), a telehealth occupational therapy intervention for community‐dwelling adults with Alzheimer’s disease exhibiting behavioral symptoms (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04555616). Method Using a single‐blind, three‐arm, randomized controlled trial design, participants were enrolled into one of the following arms: 1) individualized intervention (I) with tailored training regarding sensory stimulation to facilitate adaptive behavior and functional performance; 2) standardized intervention (S) curriculum for care partner training; and a 3) control arm (C) receiving standard of care. Both intervention arms received sensory stimulation tool kits to facilitate behavioral regulation. All participants completed 6 telehealth visits, one per week, with an occupational therapist. The primary outcome of feasibility was measured by attendance to weekly visits, and secondary outcomes included change in patient performance in functional activity assessed via the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and change in neuropsychiatric symptoms assessed via the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire. Result Thirty dyads (person with Alzheimer’s disease and their care partner) agreed to participation and were randomized. Analyses demonstrate the intervention is feasible with high adherence to weekly visits (I = 88%; S = 100%; C = 60%; p = 0.06) and high participant retention within the individualized arm (I = 80%; S = 60%; C = 50%; p‐value = 0.14). While the study was not powered to compare secondary outcomes among groups, within group exploratory analyses show promise for the individualized intervention. Improvements were observed in patient performance (baseline x̄ = 4.3; post intervention x̄ = 6.6; p = 0.04; Cohen’s d = 1.0). The individualized intervention also shows promise in reduction of behavioral symptoms (baseline x̄ = 11.55; post intervention x̄ = 8.6; p‐value = 0.06) and caregiver distress (baseline x̄ = 15.2; post intervention x̄ = 9.9; p‐value = 0.03). Conclusion This Stage 1 feasibility study identified that the Harmony at HOME intervention was feasible for community‐dwelling adults with Alzheimer’s disease and behavioral symptoms. The intervention offers promise for improved patient performance in functional activities and behavioral symptoms with a long‐term goal to prolong community residency for this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation→French-language works237,207→