MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312094053 · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syac078

Phylogenomics Reveals that Mitochondrial Capture and Nuclear Introgression Characterize Skua Species Proposed to be of Hybrid Origin

2022· article· en· W4312094053 on OpenAlexafffund
Else K. Mikkelsen, Jason T. Weir

Bibliographic record

VenueSystematic Biology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhylogenomicsBiologyIntrogressionMitochondrial DNAEvolutionary biologyZoologyPhylogeneticsCladeGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The skuas and jaegers (Stercorariidae) are an enigmatic family of seven seabird species that breed at Arctic and Antarctic latitudes. The phylogenetic relationships amongst the species have been controversial, with one of the biggest enigmas involving the Pomarine Jaeger (Stercorarius pomarinus), which has been proposed to represent a hybrid species originating from the merging of distant lineages within the complex. We inferred a phylogeny for the family using multispecies coalescent methods with whole-genome sequencing for all seven species of Stercorariidae, and document an evolutionary history rich in introgression. We uncover evidence for mitochondrial capture and nuclear introgression between S. pomarinus and Stercorarius skua, providing a potential avenue for adaptive introgression. One candidate for adaptive introgression is the MC1R plumage gene which appears to have introgressed from one of the large skuas into S. pomarinus, where it now forms the basis of the dark-morph color polymorphism of that species. We further highlight a complex biogeographical history of interchange between the Arctic and Antarctic, with unexpected close ancestry between S. skua of the northern hemisphere and Stercorarius antarcticus of the southern hemisphere. These results highlight the dynamic history of introgression during pelagic seabird radiation. [Incomplete lineage sorting; introgression; mitochondrial capture; phylogenomics; skua; species tree; stercorariidae; whole-genome resequencing.].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSystematic BiologySame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207