MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312111953 · doi:10.1101/2022.12.21.521481

Multiscale genetic architecture of donor-recipient differences reveals intronic LIMS1 locus mismatches associated with long-term renal transplant survival

2022· preprint· en· W4312111953 on OpenAlexaff
Zeguo Sun, Zhongyang Zhang, Khadija Banu, Ian W. Gibson, Robert B. Colvin, Zhengzi Yi, Weijia Zhang, Bony De Kumar, John Pell, Arjang Djamali, Lorenzo Gallon, Philip J. O’Connell, Cijiang He, Jordan S. Pober, Peter S. Heeger, Madhav C. Menon

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of HealthIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsBiologyHuman leukocyte antigenHaplotypeExpression quantitative trait lociSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenome-wide association studyAlleleGeneticsSNPLocus (genetics)Genetic associationTransplantation1000 Genomes ProjectQuantitative trait locusGeneKidney transplantationGenotypeKidneyAntigenMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Long-term kidney allograft survival remains suboptimal. Emerging evidence indicates donor-recipient (D-R) mismatches outside of human leukocyte antigens (HLA) contribute to graft survival but mechanisms remain unclear, specifically for those mismatches within intronic regions. Methods We analyzed genome-wide SNP data of D-R pairs from two well-phenotyped kidney transplant cohorts (median follow-up ~1800 days), Genomics of Chronic Allograft Rejection (GoCAR; n=385) and Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation 1/17 (CTOT1/17; n=146), quantifying genetic mismatches outside of HLA for every D-R pair at variant, gene, and genome-wide scales. Results Unbiased genome-wide screen of GoCAR D-R pairs uncovered the LIMS1 locus as the topranked candidate where D-R mismatches associated with death censored graft loss (DCGL). Independent of HLA, a previously unreported relationship between mismatches at a highly linked, intronic haplotype of 30 SNPs was seen as associated with DCGL, with confirmatory association in intra-ancestry D-Rs. Validation testing within the CTOT-01/17 showed similar associations with DCGL. Haplotype D-R mismatches showed a dosage effect, and the introduction of minor alleles in the donor to major allele-carrying recipients showed a greater risk of DCGL. Both the new LIMS1 haplotype and the previously reported LIMS1 SNP rs893403 are expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) for the gene GCC2 in recipient immune cells, without alterations in GCC2 or LIMS1 coding sequences. Transcriptome enrichment analyses performed on whole blood and within multiple T cell subsets demonstrated significant associations of GCC2 gene, and of either allelic locus, with regulation of TGF-beta-SMAD signaling, implying a role in Treg function and association with rejection. Conclusions Our analysis unravels intronic non-HLA SNP mismatches within LIMS1 that do not induce protein sequence variation but associate with DCGL. By acting as cis-eQTLs for GCC2 expression, these SNPs modulates TGF-beta signaling and T cell function, associating with immune events and graft outcomes. The findings have clinical implications for risk assessment and individualized therapy in kidney transplant recipients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments→French-language works237,207→