Kuvaevite, Ir5Ni10S16, a New Mineral Species, Its Associations and Genetic Features, from the Sisim River Placer Zone, Eastern Sayans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract —Kuvaevite, ((Ir,Rh)5(Ni,Fe,Cu)10S16), forms small grains (up to 20 µm across) in globular inclusions hosted by grains of Os–Ir–(Ru) alloys (up to 0.5 mm) in ore occurrences along the Ko River in the Sisim placer zone, Eastern Sayans. Rh-bearing pentlandite or oberthürite (or both), the minerals of the laurite-erlichmanite series and Pt–(Pd)–Fe alloys are the main associated minerals. Kuvaevite is gray to brownish gray in color in reflected light. Its bireflectance is weak to absent. It is slightly pleochroic in gray to light brown shades, and slightly anisotropic, from gray to light yellow shades. Its calculated density is 6.37 g/cm3. According to results of microprobe analyses (n = 3) carried out using wavelength-dispersive spectrometry, WDS, the composition of kuvaevite is: Cu 5.94 (4.39–6.89), Ni 13.95 (13.80–14.24), Fe 10.95 (10.18–11.97), Co 0.07 (0.06–0.10), Ir 32.38 (32.19–32.73), Rh 7.27 (7.22–7.31), Pt 1.91 (1.67–2.06), Os 0.05 (0–0.09), Ru 0.05 (0.04–0.05), S 27.06 (26.77–27.41), total 99.63 wt.%. The empirical formulae calculated using the mean results of analyses are: (Ir3.22Rh1.35Pt0.19Ru0.01Os0.01)Σ4.78(Ni4.54Fe3.75Cu1.79Co0.02)Σ10.10S16.13 (WDS) and (Ir3.23Rh1.43Pt0.25)Σ4.91(Ni4.49Fe3.57Cu1.86Co0.06)Σ9.98S16.11 (SEM/EDS; n = 56). These are based on a total of 31 atoms according to structural data obtained for torryweiserite, the rhodium-dominant analogue. Kuvaevite forms solid-solution series with torryweiserite, tamuraite and ferrotorryweiserite, all these being isostructural. The symmetry of kuvaevite was determined using the synchrotron Laue microdiffraction; the results are in good agreement with the trigonal crystal system and give the following unit-cell parameters: a = 7.079(5) Å, c = 34.344(12) Å, V = 1490(2) Å3; Z = 3. The ratio c/a is 4.852. The probable space-group, R3m (#166), is based on structural results for torryweiserite. The strongest eight reflections in the X-ray diffraction pattern derived from the microdiffraction study [d in Å(hkl) (I)], are the following: 3.0530(201)(43), 3.0103(216)(100), 2.9962(1010)(53), 2.7991(205)(50), 2.4946(208)(31), 1.9208(3110)(41), 1.7697(410)(73), 1.7582(2016)(66). The results of the electron backscatter diffraction study (EBSD) of two kuvaevite crystals are well–indexed based on the R3m space group. Kuvaevite and related sulfides significantly vary in composition in the Ko River placer, in the entire Sisim zone, and in some other ore occurrences worldwide. Associations of platinum-group minerals observed in ore occurrences at Ko River and in the Sisim zone seem to be genetically related to bedrock zones of chromite-bearing ultramafic rocks (serpentinites) of the Lysanskiy complex. Kuvaevite and other minerals present in the polymineralic inclusions, hosted by Os–Ir–(Ru) alloys, formed from droplets of residual melt. This melt accumulated the “incompatible” elements, which could not be incorporated into the structure of the host alloy, including lithophile elements, chalcogens (S, Te), semimetals (As, Sb, Bi), base metals (Fe, Ni, Cu), as well as relatively low-temperature PGE species (Pt, Pd) and Rh. There are local data on metastable crystallization and undercooling of the silicate melt, as well as effective differentiation and fractionation of S and ore components during the crystallization of these inclusions. Kuvaevite is named after O.M. Kuvaev (1934–1975), a prominent geologist, geophysicist and writer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".