The $s$-weak order and $s$-permutahedra I: combinatorics and lattice structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is the first contribution of a sequence of papers introducing the notions of $s$-weak order and $s$-permutahedra, certain discrete objects that are indexed by a sequence of non-negative integers $s$. In this first paper, we concentrate purely on the combinatorics and lattice structure of the $s$-weak order, a partial order on certain decreasing trees which generalizes the classical weak order on permutations. In particular, we show that the $s$-weak order is a semidistributive and congruence uniform lattice, generalizing known results for the classical weak order on permutations. Restricting the $s$-weak order to certain trees gives rise to the $s$-Tamari lattice, a sublattice which generalizes the classical Tamari lattice. We show that the $s$-Tamari lattice can be obtained as a quotient lattice of the $s$-weak order when $s$ has no zeros, and show that the $s$-Tamari lattices (for arbitrary $s$) are isomorphic to the $ν$-Tamari lattices of Préville-Ratelle and Viennot. The underlying geometric structure of the $s$-weak order will be studied in a sequel of this paper, where we introduce the notion of $s$-permutahedra.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".