MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312155550 · doi:10.1063/5.0130657

Turbulent characteristics and anisotropy in breaking surge waves: A numerical study

2022· article· en· W4312155550 on OpenAlexafffund
Akash Venkateshwaran, Zhuoran Li, Shooka Karimpour

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsMechanicsTurbulenceReynolds stressAnisotropyBreaking waveFroude numberStratification (seeds)InstabilityClassical mechanicsOpticsWave propagationFlow (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerical simulations of breaking weak surge waves produced by the sudden removal of a gate were conducted to investigate turbulent characteristics generated by different mechanisms in the surge front. We conducted numerical studies using Large Eddy Simulation over a range of surge Froude numbers from 1.7 to 2.5, and a wide spectrum of tempo-spatial scales down to the Hinze scale was resolved. We established turbulent statistics by means of Favre-averaging where quantities were weighted by the instantaneous density. Our results demonstrated that the production of turbulent kinetic energy is mainly sourced at the toe, where the shear layer originates. Furthermore, the decomposition of production elements illustrated that the shearing action is the principal driver in the entire surge front. Herein, we also conducted intricate anisotropy analyses, including establishing characteristic shape maps by pointwise eigendecomposition of Reynolds stress tensors. Near the toe at the core of the mixing layer, prolate structures were evident that are mainly stretched in the streamwise direction. Moving from the mixing layer toward the free surface, however, the structure changes to a combination of prolate and oblate features, where the smallest principal stress is nearly in the spanwise direction. In a snapshot, our results illustrate a clear transition in anisotropy from the recirculating region to the mixing layer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.456

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicTropical and Extratropical Cyclones ResearchFrench-language works237,207