Constraints on Secular Geocenter Velocity From Absolute Gravity Observations in Central North America: Implications for Global Melting Rates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Long series of absolute gravity observations at multiple sites provide a direct method of measuring the velocity of the geocenter caused by surface mass transport related to climate change. Annual absolute gravity observations and available GPS vertical data at eight sites in central North America from 1995 to 2010 are used to solve for geocenter velocity while correcting for glacial isostatic adjustment. The precision of the secular gravity trends and GPS heights at our sites, used to estimate geocenter motion, was improved by correcting for local and global water storage attraction and loading. Corrections for the loading and attraction effects of regional ice‐mass loss, the atmosphere and non‐tidal ocean were found to be minimal. Our results provide a direct measurement of the change in geocenter velocity over the time‐interval 2002–2010 compared to the time‐interval 1995–2003 of 0.68 ± 0.28 mm/yr away from North America. This suggests similar velocities in the negative Z (0°N) and positive Y (90°E) directions to those found by other studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".