PENGEMBANGAN E-BOOK BERBASIS PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI SIKLUS HIDUP HEWAN KELAS IV SEKOLAH DASAR
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak
 Penelitian ini menciptakan satu ciptaan berupa e-book berbasis saintifik pada materi siklus hidup hewan di kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Jenis riset ini yaitu penelitian dan pengembangan yang menggunakan model pengembangan ADDIE. Subjek riset ini adalah siswa kelas IV SDN Kebon Baru 09. Adapun data yang diperoleh dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dan observasi. Responden dalam riset ini adalah ahli desain instruksional, ahli materi, ahli linguistik dan siswa kelas IV. Hasil penelitian menunjukan kelayakan e-book berbasis pendekatan saintifik dengan persentase sebesar 96,25% dari ahli desain instruksional, 88,75% dari ahli materi, dan 92,5% dari ahli lingusitik pada kategori “sangat baik”. Hasil uji coba kepada siswa melalui penilaian perorangan sebesar 91,25% dan penilaian kelompok kecil sebesar 98,52% pada kategori “sangat baik”. Berdasarkan penilaian dari para ahli dan uji coba kepada siswa maka disimpulkan bahwa e-book berbasis pendekatan saintifik ini sangat memadai digunakan sebagai bahan ajar tambahan IPA materi siklus hidup hewan bagi siswa kelas IV Sekolah Dasar
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it