PENGEMBANGAN E-BOOK BERBASIS PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI SIKLUS HIDUP HEWAN KELAS IV SEKOLAH DASAR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstrak Penelitian ini menciptakan satu ciptaan berupa e-book berbasis saintifik pada materi siklus hidup hewan di kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Jenis riset ini yaitu penelitian dan pengembangan yang menggunakan model pengembangan ADDIE. Subjek riset ini adalah siswa kelas IV SDN Kebon Baru 09. Adapun data yang diperoleh dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dan observasi. Responden dalam riset ini adalah ahli desain instruksional, ahli materi, ahli linguistik dan siswa kelas IV. Hasil penelitian menunjukan kelayakan e-book berbasis pendekatan saintifik dengan persentase sebesar 96,25% dari ahli desain instruksional, 88,75% dari ahli materi, dan 92,5% dari ahli lingusitik pada kategori “sangat baik”. Hasil uji coba kepada siswa melalui penilaian perorangan sebesar 91,25% dan penilaian kelompok kecil sebesar 98,52% pada kategori “sangat baik”. Berdasarkan penilaian dari para ahli dan uji coba kepada siswa maka disimpulkan bahwa e-book berbasis pendekatan saintifik ini sangat memadai digunakan sebagai bahan ajar tambahan IPA materi siklus hidup hewan bagi siswa kelas IV Sekolah Dasar
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.217 | 0.057 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".