Simplified models of vector SU(4) leptoquarks at the TeV
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Assuming confirmation of the anomalies in semi-leptonic B-decays, their explanation in terms of the exchange of a massive vector leptoquark field, $$U_{\mu }^a$$ U μ a , of charge 2/3, appears to require the inclusion of $$U_{\mu }^a$$ U μ a in the vector multiplet of the adjoint of Pati–Salam SU(4), $${\mathcal {G}}_{\mu }^A$$ G μ A , as well as the introduction of vector-like fermions, $$F_j$$ F j , in the fundamental of SU(4). We consider simplified models characterised by the nature of the SU(4) symmetry (global or local), by the number of vector-like fermions, and by the couplings of the Higgs boson to SM fermions (direct or induced by mixing with the vector-like fermions). In all cases, we implement a minimal breaking of a $$U(2)^n_f$$ U ( 2 ) f n flavour symmetry, with a single motivated exception. We then perform a global fit including the main observables sensitive to exchanges of the $${\mathcal {G}}_{\mu }^A$$ G μ A at tree level and in loops dominated by logs insensitive to the UV completion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".