MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4312191245 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2022-0133

Structures and dissociation of iron porphyrin complexes by ion mobility and collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry

2022· article· en· W4312191245 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ameneh Gholami, Oliver Hampe, P. Mayer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDimerDissociation (chemistry)TrimerMonomerCollision-induced dissociationIon-mobility spectrometryPorphyrinMass spectrometryIonStructural isomerCrystallographyComputational chemistryPhotochemistryTandem mass spectrometryStereochemistryPhysical chemistryPolymerOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A combination of ion mobility mass spectrometry (IMS-MS), collision-induced dissociation (CID), Rice–Ramsperger–Kassel–Marcus modeling, and computational chemistry was used to determine the structure and unimolecular chemistry of dimeric and trimeric sulfonated meso-tetraphenylporphyrins with negative charges from −2 to −5. By comparing experimental collision cross sections obtained from calibrated IMS drift times with calculated cross sections for the lowest energy calculated structures, it was confirmed that dimer species have a bridged structure where the two monomers are connected through iron–sulfonic interactions. Dimer species with the charge states −4 and −5 dissociate into two monomer units where the charge is distributed between the monomers. Dimers with lower charge states also lose neutral SO2 and SO3 groups. For trimeric species with charge states of −3 and −4, IMS identifies three and two isomers, respectively. It was confirmed that the −4 charged trimer isomers consist of one with three stacked monomers and one in which the third monomer unit is connected to a stacked dimer via two iron–sulfonic bonds (bridged/stacked). Both yielded the same CID breakdown diagram confirming that the two isomers likely interconvert prior to dissociation. The significantly larger density of states of the bridged–stacked structure compared with the stacked structure means the former is likely the reactive configuration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Chemistry→Same topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→