MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312193040 · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05476-5

Vela pulsar wind nebula X-rays are polarized to near the synchrotron limit

2022· article· en· W4312193040 on OpenAlexaff
Fei Xie, Alessandro Di Marco, Fabio La Monaca, Kuan Liu, Fabio Muleri, N. Bucciantini, Roger W. Romani, E. Costa, John Rankin, P. Soffitta, Matteo Bachetti, Niccolò Di Lalla, Sergio Fabiani, Riccardo Ferrazzoli, Shuichi Gunji, L. Latronico, Michela Negro, N. Omodei, M. Pilia, A. Trois, Eri Watanabe, I. Agudo, L. A. Antonelli, L. Baldini, W. H. Baumgartner, R. Bellazzini, S. Bianchi, Stephen D. Bongiorno, R. Bonino, A. Brez, Fiamma Capitanio, Simone Castellano, E. Cavazzuti, S. Ciprini, Alessandra De Rosa, E. Del Monte, Laura Di Gesu, I. Donnarumma, Victor Doroshenko, Michal Dovčiak, Steven R. Ehlert, Teruaki Enoto, Y. Evangelista, Javier A. García, Kiyoshi Hayashida, Jeremy Heyl, W. Iwakiri, Svetlana G. Jorstad, V. Karas, Takao Kitaguchi, Jeffery J. Kolodziejczak, H. Krawczynski, Ioannis Liodakis, S. Maldera, Alberto Manfreda, Frédéric Marin, Andrea Marinucci, Alan P. Marscher, Herman L. Marshall, F. Massaro, G. Matt, Ikuyuki Mitsuishi, Tsunefumi Mizuno, C.‐Y. Ng, Stephen L. O’Dell, C. Oppedisano, Alessandro Papitto, George G. Pavlov, Abel L. Peirson, M. Perri, M. Pesce-Rollins, Pierre-Olivier Petrucci, Andrea Possenti, Juri Poutanen, Simonetta Puccetti, Brian D. Ramsey, Ajay Ratheesh, C. Sgró, Patrick Slane, G. Spandre, Toru Tamagawa, F. Tavecchio, Roberto Taverna, Yuzuru Tawara, Allyn F. Tennant, Nicolas E. Thomas, Francesco Tombesi, Sergey S. Tsygankov, R. Turolla, Jacco Vink, Martin C. Weisskopf, Kinwah Wu, Silvia Zane

Bibliographic record

VenueNature · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareGuangxi UniversityGoddard Space Flight CenterMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMarshall Space Flight CenterNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationInstituto de Astrofísica de AndalucíaIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsVelaPhysicsPulsarNebulaAstrophysicsSupernova remnantAstronomyHeliosphereInterstellar mediumPulsar wind nebulaSupernovaEmission nebulaNeutron starCrab NebulaMagnetic fieldGalaxyStarsSolar wind

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNatureSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207