First‐Principles Study on Interfacial Bonding Characteristics and Tensile Deformation Behavior of Ni (001)/Ni<sub>3</sub>Al (001) in K418 Superalloy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In order to theoretically explore the interfacial bonding properties between the main phase (γ) and the second precipitated phase (γ') in K418 superalloy formed by direct laser deposition. First‐principles calculation is utilized to study the adhesion work, interfacial energy, electronic structure, bonding properties, and tensile properties between γ phase (Ni (001)) and γ' phase (Ni 3 Al (001)). The results show that the interface energy of the NiAl‐center (0.35–1.19 J m −2 ) is the smallest and therefore it is with the highest interface bonding strength. The electronic analysis suggests that strong Ni‐Al covalent and ionic bonds as well as Ni‐Ni metal bonds at the interface of the NiAl‐center model are formed with the appearance of obvious orbital hybridization. The yield strength of the NiAl‐top model reaches up to 19.38 GPa under the uniaxial tensile test, which is further increased when doped with those atoms of Re, Ta, and W, up to 20.38, 20.42, and 20.93 GPa, respectively. A fundamental understanding is presented here for the design of superalloys.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it