DCFusion: Dual-Headed Fusion Strategy and Contextual Information Awareness for Infrared and Visible Remote Sensing Image
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In remote sensing, the fusion of infrared and visible images is one of the common means of data processing. Its aim is to synthesize one fused image with abundant common and differential information from the source images. At present, the fusion methods based on deep learning are widely employed in this work. However, the existing fusion network with deep learning fails to effectively integrate common and differential information for source images. To alleviate the problem, we propose a dual-head fusion strategy and contextual information awareness fusion network (DCFusion) to preserve more meaningful information from source images. Firstly, we extract multi-scale features for the source images with multiple convolution and pooling layers. Then, we propose a dual-headed fusion strategy (DHFS) to fuse different modal features from the encoder. The DHFS can effectively preserve common and differential information for different modal features. Finally, we propose a contextual information awareness module (CIAM) to reconstruct the fused image. The CIAM can adequately exchange information from different scale features and improve fusion performance. Furthermore, the whole network was tested on MSRS and TNO datasets. The results of extensive experiments prove that our proposed network achieves good performance in target maintenance and texture preservation for fusion images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".