Radar altimetry for classifying surface conditions of subarctic lakes during freezing and thawing periods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ice cover on subarctic lakes is an important indicator of climate change at local- or regional scales. This study proposes a new approach for classifying altimetry data from Jason-2 and SARAL/Altika satellite missions to characterize surface states of subarctic lakes. It focuses on Great Slave Lake (Canada) during freeze-up and thaw periods. For the first time, parameters from altimetry waveforms were used in an unsupervised clustering to establish distinct clusters from waveforms observed from Jason-2 and SARAL/Altika during the freeze-up and the thaw period. Clusters are assigned to the different surface states (open water, pure ice and leads) based on a priori altimetry and radiometric information. The statistics of these clusters were then used to construct two trained models of supervised classification based upon KNN (K-nearest neighbour) and SVM (support vector machine). The SVM-based model yielded the best results (accuracy of 92% with Jason-2, and 98% with SARAL/Altika). It was used to classify all waveforms considered in the study from the nominal orbits of Jason-2 (2008–2016) and SARAL/Altika (2013–2016). Results were superimposed onto Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) products for qualitative visual and semi-quantitative assessments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".