MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312283671 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2022.3228583

Resource Allocation for Integrated Sensing and Communication in Digital Twin Enabled Internet of Vehicles

2022· article· en· W4312283671 on OpenAlexaff
Yu Gong, Yifei Wei, Zhiyong Feng, F. Richard Yu, Yan Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceVirtualizationDistributed computingNetwork virtualizationCloud computingComputer networkResource allocation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the development of the sixth-generation (6G) network, virtualization remains critical. The key to future virtualization lies in the service provisioning capability of the network and the service requirements of end users, which will lead to virtualization of the network and end users. Therefore, this paper proposes a holistic network virtualization architecture that integrates digital twin (DT) and network slicing to achieve the network management of service-centric and user-centric. With the explosive growth of latency-sensitive and computing-intensive in-vehicle applications, limited in-vehicle computing resources are difficult to meet diverse network requirements, and vehicle edge computing (VEC) has become a potential solution. However, computation offloading may face the dilemma of excessive upload traffic and unbearable upload time. Therefore, in order to minimize the overall response time (ORT) of the system, this paper proposes a new environment aware offloading mechanism (EAOM) based on the integrated sensing and communication system (ISAC) to solve the joint optimization problem of task scheduling and resource allocation. Considering the mobility of vehicles and the time-varying of environment, the optimization problem is modeled as a Markov decision process, and an improved algorithm combining Shapley-Q value and deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) is used to solve it. The simulation results indicate the effectiveness and superiority of the scheme proposed in our work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207