MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312296513 · doi:10.1115/ipc2022-87809

High Fidelity Distributed Fiber Optic Sensing for Landslide Detection

2022· article· en· W4312296513 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carrie Murray, Ehsan Jalilian, Arfeen Najeeb, Sam Toms, Tasnim M. Taufique Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and Joining · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsHusky Energy (Canada)Stantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLandslideInclinometerGeologyGeophoneRemote sensingWarning systemPipeline transportAccelerometerFiber optic sensorGeotechnical engineeringOptical fiberSeismologyEnvironmental scienceGeodesyEngineeringComputer scienceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pipeline integrity management continues to adapt and improve with the adoption of new technologies. In 2016, Husky Midstream had a loss of containment incident on a 16-inch diameter pipeline on the south slope of the North Saskatchewan River in Saskatchewan, Canada. The incident was determined to be caused by ground movement resulting from a landslide complex. The landslide complex on the south slope contains two deep-seated compound basal shear slides as well as a near surface translational slide in low strength clay shales. A robust state-of-the-art instrumentation monitoring program was implemented that included real-time geotechnical instrumentation, high fidelity distributed fiber optic sensing (HDS), repeat ILI and on-site weather data to identify, evaluate and monitor areas of ground and pipeline movement so that potential impacts to the pipelines could be mitigated. An early-warning system that included alarm thresholds was developed that identified when to proactively shut-in the pipeline. The HDS monitoring comprised strain, acoustic and temperature sensing, and was installed to provide leak detection monitoring, however, it revealed an excellent correlation to the geotechnical, ILI and weather station monitoring data on the actively moving landslide complex. This paper shows a number of these correlations over the HDS monitoring period from October 2017 to November 2018. The HDS monitoring showed increased strain magnitudes following significant rainfall events that correlated to an acceleration in slope inclinometer (SIs fitted with shape accelerometer arrays, SAAs) and survey monument (SM) movement. Locations of high strain accumulation correlated to ILI locations of bending strain. Accumulated strain and displacements in SAAs and SMs were measured despite the lack of visual evidence of ground cracking on the right-of-way (ROW). Construction activity on the ROW was detected through acoustic and strain signatures. As pipeline operators continue to include high fidelity fiber optic sensing as a continuous linear sensor along new and existing pipelines primarily as a leak detection tool, other critical applications, such as early detection of active landslides can be included as an important component of the integrity management system or separately as part of a robust monitoring system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 3: Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance; Materials and JoiningSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207