MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312300924 · doi:10.37867/te130366

DECIPHERING THE ROLE OF EXPERIMENTALLY VALIDATED NICOTIANA TABACUM (TOBACCO) MIRNAS IN HUMAN HEALTH – A COMPUTATIONAL GENOMICS ASSESSMENT

2021· article· en· W4312300924 on OpenAlexaff
Mansi Bhavsar, Naman Mangukia, Archana Mankad

Bibliographic record

VenueTowards Excellence · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNicotiana tabacumBiologymicroRNANicotianaRegulatorNicotineComputational biologyGeneticsBiotechnologyGeneSolanaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) is considered as the tropical model plant for research especially for alkaloid like nicotine. One of the public health problems worldwide is harmful usage of tobacco that kills half of their consumers. On the other hand, Nicotiana tabacum was used as chief medicinal plants by native Americans, Amazonian and ancient Indians to cure poisonous reptiles’ bites and multiple diseases. MicroRNA (miRNA) is a prime gene regulator amongst the class of small-RNAs which binds with mRNA using translational repression or cleavage mechanism. Till the date, tobacco plant derived miRNAs were studied to check stress response in different biotic and abiotic condition and phylogenetic analysis, plant growth and development. Thus, cross-kingdom approach helps to understand the possible regulation as well as modulation in human health targeted by tobacco specific miRNAs. Tobacco derived miRNAs along with their targets were predicted and functionally annotated, pathway enrichment and disease association were studied in this study. Conclusively, we can report that N. tabacum miRNAs showed association with carcinoma and multiple neural, cardiac disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTowards ExcellenceSame topicPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesFrench-language works237,207