Bibliographic record
Abstract
Harry Johnstone is one of our most distinguished scholars of music in eighteenth-century Britain. Canadian by birth, he studied at the Royal College of Music, London, and at Balliol College, Oxford, where he was organ scholar. His musicological interests were encouraged by Walter Emery, the great Bach scholar, who became his scholarly mentor in the late 1950s. Subsequently, he took as the subject of his doctoral work at Oxford the composer Maurice Greene, who, though now recognized as one of the most gifted English musicians of his day, was then a decidedly unfashionable topic for scholarly research. English music of the period, long considered to have been in the doldrums by comparison with the European mainstream, has since revealed its considerable riches, in no small part thanks to the work of Harry and other pioneers in the field. Harry was a lecturer at the University of Reading before returning, in 1980, to Oxford, as a university lecturer (later Reader) and Fellow (now Emeritus) at St Anne's College. There, in addition to his teaching and administrative duties, he was involved in practical music-making, an aspect of his professional life that at both Oxford and Reading saw him conduct rare performances of some of the English music that so interested him. He participated in the ceremonial aspects of the university calendar. As Dean of Degrees, begowned and declaiming in Latin, he would present successive cohorts of students for the conferral of their degrees at the Sheldonian Theatre. That Handel too had in 1733 played to an audience in that very room is a happy coincidence. Highly regarded for his research into Handel's English contemporaries, Harry has also made notable contributions to our knowledge of music in the late seventeenth century, and his publications reveal his particular interests in the history, performance practice, and sources of music that shaped British musical culture of the era. As co-editor, he brought to fruition volume 4 of The Blackwell History of Music in Britain, which had been planned by the late Roger Fiske. The resulting book, published in 1990, was the first to treat the eighteenth century as a whole, and its comprehensive coverage and extensive bibliography remain a starting point for researchers. He is the author of numerous book chapters and articles, and he has written entries for all the major reference works.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.018 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.054 | 0.051 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".