Bibliographic record
Abstract
The International Programme Committee for the 5th International Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (EBLIP5) Conference invites you to submit oral presentations and posters for the conference, Bridging the Gap, to be held in Stockholm, Sweden from 29 June – 3 July 2009. We seek to build on the success of past conferences by including more disciplines, more sectors, more countries and more professional roles than ever before! The International Programme Committee for EBLIP5 invites research papers, reports of innovative practice and hot topic discussion papers. Key themes include, but are by no means limited to, the following: Bridging the gap…the Who? • ...between disciplines - communications and information studies; health and social care • ...between sectors - public and private sectors; health library sector/wider library information service sectors including academic, public, and special libraries; archivists and local libraries and collections • ...between cultures - developed and developing world; librarianship cultures; English speaking/other speaking countries Bridging the gap…the What? • ...the “implementation gap” - principles and practice; research/practice; research/policy; experiment/implementation; tradition/innovation; innovation and disinvestment; reflection and action, knowledge/action; personal learning to professional practice • ...the “expectation gap” - library services and user needs; the e-generation and the physical library • ...the “experimentation gap” – data and results; R&D and EBLIP; information seeking research/information literacy teaching; implementation and evaluation • ...the “skills gap” – practitioner knowledge and skills; librarians and research skills; leadership and implementation Bridging the gap…the How? • ...using marketing/advocacy • ...using data mining and management tools • ...through collaborative working (with teachers, with academics) • ...through communication (internal and external) • ...through management support and leadership • ...through international co-operation Abstract submission for oral presentations and posters is by e-mail to EBLIP5@kib.ki.se. Important dates: • Abstracts to be submitted by 31 October 2008. • Notification of acceptance will be received by 31 January 2009. • Confirmation of participation by mid-February 2009. • Registration opens in March 2009. • Deadline for submission of full papers - June 2009. See the conference video at .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.039 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.020 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.014 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.851 | 0.793 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".