MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312386427 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2022.3223123

Blocker-Tolerant Inductor-Less Harmonic Selection Wideband Receiver Front-End for 5G Applications

2022· article· en· W4312386427 on OpenAlexaff
Nakisa Shams, Frédéric Nabki

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLocal oscillatorBasebandRF front endWidebandElectrical engineeringNoise figureRadio frequencyFrequency multiplierBandwidth (computing)CMOSElectronic engineeringHarmonicsAmplifierPhysicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A blocker-tolerant harmonic selection receiver front-end with RF bandwidth of 6.5 GHz to support the fifth-generation (5G) sub-6 GHz band is presented. The proposed N-path switching filter-based receiver employs harmonic recombination blocks at the baseband (BB) to select the desired local oscillator (LO) harmonics and suppress blockers. It is demonstrated how the configuration of two feed-forward N-path switching filters and BB harmonic recombination stage can be reconfigured to select the first harmonic of the switching frequency at the low-frequency band (0.5–1.9 GHz) and the third LO harmonic at the high-frequency band (1.95–6 GHz). Thus, the proposed architecture has the capability of supporting an RF input frequency of up to 6 GHz while the switching frequency operates up to 2 GHz. Higher harmonic selection in addition to the fundamental helps to reduce the power consumption and required input frequency of the multiphase LO clock generator. An RF receiver prototype is fabricated in a TSMC 130-nm CMOS technology. It achieves a 5 dB noise figure (NF), −16.6 dBm in-band input-referred third-order intercept point (IIP3), and 9 dBm out-of-band (OOB) IIP3, respectively, at the low-frequency band (0.5–1.9 GHz). The 2nd–5th harmonic rejection ratios (HRRs) are higher than 44 dB without any calibration. The receiver can tolerate a 0 dBm blocker at a 180 MHz offset from a 1 GHz switching frequency with an NF of 9.4 dB. Over the high-frequency band (1.95–6 GHz), the receiver’s NF is less than 7.1 dB. Moreover, in-band IIP3, OOB IIP3, and first HRR are higher than −21 dBm, 7 dBm, and 39 dB, respectively. The receiver achieves an S11 better than −10 dB over 0.5–6 GHz, and has a total power consumption of 17–22.5 mW from a 1.2 V supply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) SystemsSame topicRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207