MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312393630 · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2022.3227596

Inland Water Mapping Based on GA-LinkNet From CyGNSS Data

2022· article· en· W4312393630 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaMinistry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China
KeywordsPoolingPyramid (geometry)Computer scienceCyclone (programming language)Artificial intelligenceRemote sensingMathematicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sensitivity of Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CyGNSS) data to inland water bodies was well documented, however, its advantage over other sensors has seldom been reported. In this work, a semantic segmentation method is adopted for detecting inland water bodies using the CyGNSS data. The widely used LinkNet with the global attention mechanism (GAM) and atrous spatial pyramid pooling (ASPP), namely GA-LinkNet, is equipped to better extract water distributions. The performance comparison with an existing method and other deep networks proved the accuracy and effectiveness of this approach. Satisfactory agreement between the derived and referenced water masks was achieved, with the overall accuracy being 0.959 and 0.976, the mean intersection over union being 0.785 and 0.641, and the F1 scores being 0.879 and 0.781 for the Amazon and Congo regions, respectively. Furthermore, underestimation of water by the reference data was shown during evaluation, which proves the usefulness of the CyGNSS-derived water mask for improving the existing water mask products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it