MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface from the IEEE LAEDC 2022 Conference General Chair

2022· article· en· W4312401021 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEngineering Education and Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansPresentation (obstetrics)Library scienceCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicPolitical scienceComputer scienceMedicineLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Latin-America Electron Device Conference (LAEDC) is a premier IEEE Latin-American and Caribbean Electron Devices conference sponsored by IEEE's Electron Device Society (EDS).Its first edition took place in Colombia in 2019.In 2020 Costa Rica hosted the second edition.Because of the COVID pandemic, in 2021 the conference took place as a full virtual edition.This 2022 the conference took place in the City of Puebla in Mexico with a hybrid in-person and virtual mode.Despite the COVID pandemics the conference shows a historic steadily growing throughout the last 4 years of existence, as showed by the 128 submitted contributions from 37 different countries from America, Africa, Asia, and Europe.This progressive growing comes accompanied by a strong participation of 140 authors from Latin America and the Caribbean.After a careful review process 78 papers out of the 128 were accepted for either in-person or virtual presentation, and for publication in the IEEE conference proceedings.With the review process we keep a high quality of the technical contributions with a 61 % acceptance rate.Latin-America and the Caribbean authors contributed with over 50 % of the submitted papers, followed by India with over 13%, USA and Canada with over 11 %, and Europe with over 20 %, in addition to contributions from Saudi Arabia and Australia.The LAEDC conference is accomplishing the objective of spreading and attracting more participants into the electron devices university and research community in Latin America and in the Caribbean region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0110.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1310.158

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEngineering Education and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207