Civil architecture of the Vyatka province during the reign of Nicholas I
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Статья посвящена исследованию архитектурного наследия Вятской губернии времени правления Николая I. На примере анализа проектных чертежей рассматриваются тенденции и направления в гражданской архитектуре Вятской губернии второй четверти и середины XIX в. Исследование опирается на обширный корпус архивных источников, выявленных в ходе работы в крупнейших архивах России. Большая часть анализируемых документов вводится в научный оборот впервые и в итоге позволяет создать целостную картину эволюции гражданской архитектуры Вятской губернии первой половины и середины XIX в. This paper is presents to the architectural heritage of the Vyatka province during the reign of Nicholas I. We studied archival drawings and identified trends and directions in the civil architecture of the Vyatka province of the second quarter and the middle of the 19th century. The study is based on an extensive corpus of archival sources collected in the largest archives of Russia. Most of the analyzed documents are introduced into scientific circulation for the first time. This research a complete picture of the evolution of the civil architecture of the Vyatka province in the first half and middle of the 19th century.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".