MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312408015 · doi:10.25628/uniip.2022.54.3.011

Civil architecture of the Vyatka province during the reign of Nicholas I

2020· article· ru· W4312408015 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Татьяна Александровна Гильдина, Михаил Валентинович Курочкин

Bibliographic record

VenueАкадемический вестник УралНИИпроект РААСН · 2020
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European History and Architecture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReignArchitectureQuarter (Canadian coin)Ancient historyHistoryMiddle AgesArchaeologyGeographyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Статья посвящена исследованию архитектурного наследия Вятской губернии времени правления Николая I. На примере анализа проектных чертежей рассматриваются тенденции и направления в гражданской архитектуре Вятской губернии второй четверти и середины XIX в. Исследование опирается на обширный корпус архивных источников, выявленных в ходе работы в крупнейших архивах России. Большая часть анализируемых документов вводится в научный оборот впервые и в итоге позволяет создать целостную картину эволюции гражданской архитектуры Вятской губернии первой половины и середины XIX в. This paper is presents to the architectural heritage of the Vyatka province during the reign of Nicholas I. We studied archival drawings and identified trends and directions in the civil architecture of the Vyatka province of the second quarter and the middle of the 19th century. The study is based on an extensive corpus of archival sources collected in the largest archives of Russia. Most of the analyzed documents are introduced into scientific circulation for the first time. This research a complete picture of the evolution of the civil architecture of the Vyatka province in the first half and middle of the 19th century.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueАкадемический вестник УралНИИпроект РААСНSame topicMedieval European History and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207