MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312436186 · doi:10.1130/2022.1220(001)

The tectonic evolution of Laurentia and the North American continent: New datasets, insights, and models

2022· book-chapter· en· W4312436186 on OpenAlexaff
Steven J. Whitmeyer, Dawn A. Kellett, Basil Tikoff, Michael L. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society of America eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsGovernment of CanadaGeological Survey of CanadaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaurentiaRodiniaGeologyOrogenyPaleontologyTerraneGondwanaPaleozoicBalticaEarth scienceRiftOrdovicianTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The North American continent has a rich geologic record that preserves evidence for tectonic processes throughout much of Earth’s history. Within this long history, however, particular times—e.g., “turning points”—have had specific and lasting impact on the evolution of Laurentia (ancestral North America). This volume is focused on seven of these “turning points”: (1) The Neoarchean (2.7–2.5 Ga), characterized by cratonization and the Kenoran orogen(s); (2) the Paleoproterozoic (1.9–1.7 Ga) and the initial assembly of Laurentia; (3) the Mesoproterozoic (1.5–1.4 Ga) Andean-style margin on the southern edge of Laurentia with the Pinware-Baraboo-Picuris orogeny; (4) the 1.2–1.0 Ga Midcontinent rift, and the Grenville orogeny and assembly of Rodinia; (5) the 700–500 Ma Neoproterozoic breakup of Rodinia; (6) the mid-Paleozoic (420–340 Ma) closure of the Iapetus and Rheic oceans and the development of the Appalachian-Caledonian orogen; and (7) the Jurassic–Paleogene (200–50 Ma) assembly of the North American Cordilleran margin by terrane accretion and subduction. The assembled chapters provide syntheses of current understanding of the geologic evolution of Laurentia and North America, as well as new hypotheses for testing. The inclusion of work from different geological time periods within a single volume provides continent-wide perspectives on the evolution of tectonic events and processes that acted on and within Laurentia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society of America eBooksSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207