MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312439113 · doi:10.46692/9781529213621.010

Slavia Prague v. Glasgow Rangers: Lessons from a Football Match

2022· other· en· W4312439113 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntellectual Property Law
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFootballHistoryLibrary scienceArchaeologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

‘Why should we kneel? We’re not England, who colonized half the world and carries the burden of slavery stemming from its history. We need not apologize to anyone.’ So said a fan of the Czech soccer champions, Slavia Prague. He was commenting on Slavia's refusal to kneel before their match against London's Arsenal, on 8 April 2021. A few days earlier, an irate Polish commentator demanded, ‘Let Russian and German footballers kneel before Poles, to ask their forgiveness!’ Piotr Lisiewicz added that while ‘the British had colonies, Poles were in Russian and German servitude’. His reference was to a game that pitted Poland against England. In both matches, the English side took the knee as a gesture in support of the Black Lives Matter movement. Athletes were especially honouring the memory of George Floyd, the Black American murdered the year before by a white Minneapolis policeman. (The symbolic gesture dates back to 2016, with American football player Colin Kaepernick taking the knee during the playing of the US national anthem.) Previously, the Czechs had no problem kneeling also. In fact, the Czech national team had knelt during the anthems when they faced the Scottish nationals just a few months earlier, on 14 October 2020. But something had changed drastically on 18 March, when Prague Slavia beat Glasgow Rangers 2– 0, on the Scottish team's own turf. Tensions were high at the Ibrox Stadium. The winner was to proceed into the quarter finals of the Europa Cup. As they have many times, Rangers had recently again qualified as Scottish champions, and had not lost a game at home for a year. At least to their own fans, they were the favourites. But Slavia came to Glasgow after a streak of 18 games without a loss, and could not be easily written off. Fourteen minutes into the game, Slavia's forward Peter Oliyanka, a Black player from Nigeria, scored a header that travelled over the Rangers’ defence into goalie McGregor's net. The Scottish team was frustrated by several missed scoring opportunities. They fumed that the referee refused to call a penalty when, as the Scots saw it, Slavia's Abdallah Sima (also a Black footballer) committed a serious foul. After the break, at minute 61, Glasgow's Kemar Roofe attempted to kick a high ball and the Czech goalie, Ondřej Kolář, jumped to catch it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6520.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIntellectual Property LawFrench-language works237,207