Bibliographic record
Abstract
While feminists within the field of gender studies challenge the capitalism, patriarchy, and colonialism that they identify in the field of theological studies, theologians argue that approaches such as Marxist feminism cannot be applied to theological teaching principles.As a result, these two academic fields are treated as mutually exclusive.In order to bridge the divide between these two disciplines, this paper engages in an interdisciplinary study between theological and feminist studies.I intend to conduct archival and library research on the overlap between Christian missionary history and Chinese and Japanese women's history.Evidence of this overlap can be found in the memorandum The Story of Canadian Methodist Women Missionaries published by Toyo Eiwa Girls' Academy in 2010 in memory of Methodist women's missionary work in Japan.Annual reports housed in the United Church Archives clearly document the history of how Canadian home missions rescued Chinese slave girls and received Japanese picture brides upon their arrival in Canada, and of how Canadian foreign missions spread Christian teaching abroad.In contrast, Tani E. Barlow -a Chinese feminist critic -in The Question of Women in Chinese Feminism, explores the history of Chinese feminism and its connection with Japanese and western feminism.In 1975, a Japanese countryman whispered the story of Yamada Waka (1878-1956) to Tomoko Yamazaki, a researcher of Japanese women's history, and in 1978, she wrote in Japanese The Song of an Ameyuki Girl: The Vicissitudes of Yamada Waka's Life.Moving beyond a literature review of these
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.014 | 0.011 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.096 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.014 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".