MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312541332 · doi:10.35366/108189

Fibroma osificante juvenil trabecular en maxilar superior con sarcomatización: seguimiento a 18 años

2022· article· es· W4312541332 on OpenAlexaff
Norbin José Mendoza Cuello, J. M. Astigueta, Alberto Hugo Attaguile, G. Giannunzio

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicBone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ossifying fibroma a benign neoplasm of fibroosseous tissue, with well-defined limits histologically characterized a large amount of fibrocellular and mineralized tissue.This pathology is classified two categories, including juvenile trabecular ossifying fibroma (TrOF) and psammomatoid (PsOF).Although the characteristics of these lesions are presented in a similar way, the great difference between them is the average age of presentation: 6-11.5 years the trabecular and from 12-18.9 years older the psammomatoid.Between these two groups there are histological variants and among them is the possible and unusual presentation of malignancy within the histology.The aim of this report is to describe the treatment of an eight-year-old female patient with a diagnosis of highly aggressive juvenile ossifying fibroma with points of possible sarcomatous transformation in maxillary without recurrences clinical, radiographic and tomographic follow-up for 18 years. RESUMENEl fibroma osificante es una neoplasia benigna de tejido fibro-óseo, con márgenes bien definidos que histológicamente se caracteriza por tener gran cantidad de tejido fibrocelular y mineralizado.Esta patología se clasifica en dos grandes categorías, el fibroma osificante juvenil trabecular (TrOF por sus siglas en inglés) y el psamomatoide (PsOF por sus siglas en inglés).Si bien las características de estas lesiones se presentan de manera similar, la gran diferencia entre estas es la edad promedio de presentación: 6-11.5 años el trabecular y a partir de los 12-18.9años el psamomatoide.Entre estos dos grupos hay variantes histológicas y entre ellas, se encuentra la posible e inusual presentación de malignizacion dentro de la histología.El objetivo de nuestro trabajo es describir el plan de tratamiento de una paciente femenina de ocho años de edad con diagnóstico de fibroma osificante juvenil de alta agresividad con áreas de posible transformación sarcomatosa en maxilar superior sin recidivas y seguimiento clínico, radiográfico y tomográfico durante 18 años.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207