MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SOURCES ON DEVELOPMENT OF PRIKAZ EMBANKMENT ARCHITECTURAL LOOK IN THE 17th CENTURY

2022· article· ru· W4312561239 on OpenAlex
М. В. Вдовиченко

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueКраткие сообщения Института археологии (КСИА) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFacadeArchitectureExcavationCapital (architecture)HistoryArchaeologyPlan (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Period (music)Architectural engineeringVisual artsEngineeringArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

В результате раскопок Института археологии РАН в Большом Кремлевском сквере обнаружены фундаменты береговых Приказов XVII в. Здание было известно лишь по гравюрам XVIII в., по которым составить полное представление о его архитектуре не представлялось возможным, поэтому оно не было введено в историю русского искусства. Обнаруженные археологами фрагменты здания дают первые материальные свидетельства его существования, раскопки инициировали изучение его истории и архитектуры. В статье систематизируются собранные к настоящему времени архивные сведения, реконструирующие хронологию строительства комплекса приказных зданий. Письменные и изобразительные источники свидетельствуют, что сооружение Приказов охватывало период с 1675 по 1702 г. и происходило в шесть этапов. Каждый этап нашел отражение в декорации фасадов здания, запечатленных на сохранившемся чертеже северного фасада 1740-х гг. Набережные Приказы, таким образом, встраиваются в линию развития столичной архитектуры последней четверти XVII в. и занимают в ней место одного из первопамятников благодаря особенностям фасадной декорации и своим объемно-пространственным решениям. The excavations carried out by the Institute of Archaeology, RAS, in the Grand Kremlin Public Garden discovered foundation pits of the river bank building of the Prikazes (prikaz is an administrative, judicial, territorial, or executive office) from the 17th century. The building was known only from 18th century engravings that could not give a full understanding of its architecture; for this reason, it was not included in the history of Russian art. Fragments of the building found by the archaeologists provide the first material evidence of its existence, the excavations launched the study of its history and architecture. The paper systemizes available archival data reconstructing chronology regarding the construction of the prikaz group of buildings. Written and illustrative sources demonstrate that the Prikazes were built in the period from 1675 to 1702 in six stages. Each stage was reflected in the decoration of the building facade documented in a schematic drawing of the northern facade made in the 1740s. Naberezhnye Prikazes, therefore, fit into the development trends of the capital architecture in the last quarter of the 17th century, being one of the first historical sites due to specific features of their facade decoration and building massing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it