MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312594729 · doi:10.1161/atvb.42.suppl_1.483

Abstract 483: External Counterpulsation Therapy (Renew™ NCP-5) For The Treatment Of Mild Cognitive Impairment Due To Alzheimer’s Disease Or Mild Dementia Of The Alzheimer’s Type

2022· article· en· W4312594729 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrick M. Moriarty, Lauryn K. Gorby, David H. Salat, Jeffrey M. Burns, Thomas N Moreno, Jonathan Helfgott

Bibliographic record

VenueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDementiaMedicineInternal medicineClinical endpointVascular dementiaCardiologyAlzheimer's diseaseDiseaseRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Research is elucidating vascular impairment in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and as a treatment target. NCP-5 is external counterpulsation (ECP) therapy approved for treating unstable angina and granted FDA Breakthrough Status for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD. It increases cardiac output and improves endothelial function. A study was done to assess NCP-5 on cognitive function. Methods: Randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled; 10 US sites. Subjects 55-85 years (Montreal Cognitive Assessment score ≥11) were given NCP-5 (n=95) or active sham (n=95). Primary endpoint: mean change from baseline in Vascular Dementia Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (VADAS-Cog) at 12, 18, and 24 weeks, powered for a 2-point change. Results: Primary endpoint met (change, -4.45 points); NCP-5 showed statistically significantly greater improvement from baseline vs active sham on VADAS-Cog. In subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D; n=36), NCP-5 improved cognition from baseline (change, -17.01 points; p <0.005). NCP-5 was statistically significantly superior to active sham on Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study-Clinical Global Impression of Change at weeks 12 (odds ratio [OR], 2.13; p =0.013) and 24 (OR, 2.56; p =0.002). NCP-5 had a statistically significant decrease on Neuropsychiatric Inventory Aggression Index vs active sham at week 24 ( p =0.041). Neuroimaging showed a decline in right hippocampal volume (HV) that was statistically significantly greater with NCP-5 at week 24 ( p =0.012) and at longitudinal assessment to 12 months ( p =0.008), possibly related to smaller HV seen at baseline with NCP-5. However, the decline in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the left hippocampus from baseline to month 12 and for the longitudinal assessment was statistically significantly less with NCP-5 than with active sham ( p =0.010 and 0.019, respectively). NCP-5 had a low-risk safety profile (10,644 exposures), and the most common AE was mild skin irritation/injury. Conclusions: Renew NCP-5 improved cognitive performance and global function, particularly in those with T2D. Findings support the role of targeting vascular dysfunction, specifically with NCP-5, for the treatment of MCI and mild dementia of the Alzheimer’s type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular BiologySame topicPain Management and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207