MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4312627068 · doi:10.5376/ijh.2022.12.0004

Screening and Transcriptome Analysis of Different Materials with Low Temperature Tolerance in Eggplant (<i>Solanum melongena</i>)

2022· article· en· W4312627068 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zongwen Zhu, Xuexia Wu, Aidong Zhang, Dingshi Zha

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Horticulture · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeedlingGermplasmSolanumTranscriptomeBiologyGerminationHorticultureGeneInbred strainBotanyGene expressionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The growth and fruit quality of eggplant were seriously affected by low temperature stress. In order to screen low temperature tolerance germplasm of eggplant and reveal its correlation with low temperature tolerance at molecular level. In this study, two eggplant inbred lines with different genotypes were selected on the basis of preliminary experiments. The effects of low temperature stress on the seed germination and seedling chilling injury were studied. The transcriptome of seedling leaves under 4°C low temperature was sequenced, and the differentially expressed genes were classified and enriched. The results showed that CHEN18 was much stronger than 819 in seed germination and seedling low temperature tolerance. The analysis of transcriptome data showed that there were some differences in genetic background between the two eggplant materials, and the differentially expressed genes were mainly concentrated in biological regulation, cell process, metabolic process and single organism process. Up-regulated differentially expressed genes are mainly enriched in cell processes, environmental information processing, genetic information processing and metabolism. The results of this study laid a foundation for the selection of cold tolerance germplasm and the excavation of cold tolerance genes in eggplant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.902
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of HorticultureSame topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207