MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

3D point clouds simplification based on geometric primitives and graph-structured optimization

2022· article· en· W4312662496 on OpenAlexaff
Stéphane Guinard, Sylvie Daniel, Thierry Badard

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoint cloudComputer scienceGeometric networksGeometric primitiveOutlierGeometric modelingGraphSimple (philosophy)AlgorithmMeasure (data warehouse)Point (geometry)Solid modelingTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsData miningGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new method for the simplification of 3D point clouds for digital twin city models. Such data usually contains a large amount of redundant information, noise and outliers. This implies that most of subsequent processing tasks are costly both in terms of processing times and hardware infrastructure. The core idea of this paper is that most of the objects present in such scenes can be approximated as a combination of simple geometric primitives. This approximation can, in turn, be simplified by keeping only points and edges that effectively describe the shape of the input scene. Our main contribution is a formulation of the approximation of 3D point clouds with simple geometric primitives as a global optimization problem. We then introduce a new algorithm to efficiently solve this problem with a graph-cut-based approach. We measure the performances of our approach against state-of-the-art methods by comparing the geometric quality of the approximations with the amount of information needed to represent the simplified models. The evaluation of our approach is done on Mobile Laser Scanning (MLS) acquisitions in urban areas. Test areas include single objects and street portions to show the adaptability of our method to various geometries. We show improvements both in terms of geometrical error and final model size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2022 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)Same topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207